Mmpi-2-rf online11/14/2022 ![]() ![]() ![]() The findings provide strong support for the construct validity of the MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF RC scales and the assessment of personality disorders in a forensic setting. The RC scales also accounted for additional variance over the NEO-PI-R domain scales for 8 out of the 10 SCID-II PQ personality disorder raw scores and provided a clinically accurate profile of personality disorders when expressed in their more pathological variants in a forensic population. The findings for this study demonstrated the construct validity of the RC scales whenĬompared to the SCID-II PQ personality disorder raw scores and the NEO-PI-R domainĪnd facet scales. This study utilised a forensic sample (n = 83) in order to analyse the construct validity of the RC scales when compared to the Structured Clinical Interview for the fourth edition of the DSM (DSM-IV APA, 1994) Axis II Disorders-Personality Questionnaire (SCID-II PQ First, Gibbon, Spitzer, Williams & Benjamin, 1997) and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R Costa & McCrae, 1992). Tellegen et al.'s project resulted in the development of nine RC scales that were designed to be independent of the pervasive influence of the first factor, more distinctive and a more accurate measure of the core psychological constructs the original Clinical scales were designed to measure. Limitations of the Clinical scales and to measure the core psychological constructs of each of the Clinical scales whilst enhancing convergent and particularly discriminant validity. (2003) constructed the RC scales to address the perceived psychometric (MMPI-2 Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) and MMPI-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008) and the assessment of Scales (Tellegen et al., 2003) of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 The findings of this study provide further evidence for the utility of the L-r and K-r scales in detecting underreporting extension to both a preemployment evaluation context and a novel population.The current study examined the construct validity of the Restructured Clinical (RC) Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Classification accuracy analyses provided additional evidence for the utility of the L-r and K-r scales by supporting their respective cut scores listed in the MMPI–2–RF manual (Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2011 Ben-Porath, Y. Additionally, L-r and K-r added incremental predictive utility over one another when differentiating the standard instruction and underreporting groups. Results indicated that individuals who completed the MMPI–2–RF with underreporting instructions exhibited significantly lower scores on the majority of the MMPI–2–RF substantive scales, and significantly higher scores on the L-r and K-r validity scales. We used a combined sample of 784 university students, with 173 participants completing the MMPI–2–RF with instruction to underreport in the context of applying for a job, and 611 completing the test under standard instructions. The study aimed to increment the previous literature in this field using a New Zealand population. ) Uncommon Virtues (L-r) and Adjustment Validity (K-r) scales in detecting underreporting. This study examined the validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2–Restructured Form (MMPI–2–RF Tellegen & Ben-Porath, 2011 Ben-Porath, Y. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |